Now, is that a company, or any public body, not being a natural person can not make private copies. It would be pointless use "private."
On the other hand, the so-called digital canon is paid as compensation for losses suffered by copyright holders for the use, legal, private copying. As would be almost impossible to know that private copies are made, it was decided a fee, you pay when you buy any equipment, support, which can be used to make these private copies.
How do you decide the amount the canyon, to apply accurately and equipment will be managed is another matter. Also very ... busy.
Anyway, I come to a conclusion, who knows if reasonable: if a company can not lawfully make private copies, how is it you have to pay a fee for them?.
It's as if my son was charged for a driver's license who has not, and if you drive a car that should not !!!!.
Typically if a company backs "private" and he put a fine point. And the other companies do not have to pay royalties prevention.
Just think how much money that this approach will fail to handle those friends sgae and co. Do the ministries that pay royalties?, What about the council? What ?,... Canal YII
0 comments:
Post a Comment