few days ago, taking a beer, my friend Javier asked me which went from Citizens to Upyd. The question really is different from the standard, as we are not together, you know.
The answer was changed several times in my head before leaving. First you pass through a phase of denial, anger another ... you have to digest the disappointment, of course.
the end, what I find most true and I said, is that most went for what we call "the vote". That is, they have no ideological stick with Citizens ; might be one if, as some were unhappy egos.
But many, many, thought a non-professional game of politics as Citizens could not get ahead in this world of election campaigns.
is true that the experience is a plus, and certainly a professional knows it all, but it is also true that most easily fall into what we want to avoid, there are professional politicians.
So I think it became Upyd that was what was more likely outside the "big" without evaluating that same sin is what has brought us to bipartisanship.
I've met a few, and many I can say that are people of great worth, but I think that the rush to change things has made them fall into error.
I hear complaining that they are not invited to debates and other similar acts, if I tell them ... we can barely hear us complain about it?.
how this works is that we have, that someday will be democracy and which is now only open on the network.
Sinde y Cia
While not impossible.
0 comments:
Post a Comment