Pokemon Emerald On Sixtyforce

... NO is Peru

.. . I can not vote PPK!
no longer be like a vote luxury, like looking for a moral status, or spread, as regrettable and paradoxically, this time (sorry, paradoxically "again") we should choose the best. (I ask them to postpone a bit the qualifiers for me, please.) Why should I give my vote to someone who does not believe the best candidate and why I give my vote, again, someone has stolen? (I'll get to argue about whether stolen or not, or how or why ... now accept vaguely that he did, it does not alter my argument.)

results by congressional district. Light blue and blue, won Ollanta Humala,
green, Lourdes Flores, in orange and red, Alan García.
Source: Wikipedia, general elections in Peru, 2006

thefts do not approve of Castro, or the Fujimori and García or anyone ... but I had to vote for Gordo Garcia in 2006, with nausea, with no guarantee of democracy that gave Humala. "This fat is going to steal and will be a thought #$%/*", corrupt m ... and although I was not wrong in my prediction, I do not regret having voted for a thief rather than by an oppressor (and choose how ugly!). I want to save a bit of distance between Ollanta and Abimael Guzman, but unfortunately not much given his history, and no distance that can be compared to Chavez (no need to talk about how a monkey with a machine gun governs a country, right?) . Now I will not vote for Alan Garcia (God save us from doing it again!) but at least I know

Source: Journal of Management March 22, 2011

raw Tell me, limited, uneducated ... what they want. But as I see, PPK Ollanta not beaten or Keiko, candidates who do not represent values \u200b\u200bor guarantees for a democratic state (and respectful of the freedoms & rights, if necessary, write it down). Is the result of a divided country, with millions of forgotten who claim to be part of the country's economic growth and identifying characters or mislabeled Fujimori "Nationalist" in opportunities given the ineffectiveness of government in redistribution.

While still falling in the polls, Castaneda would beat all his rivals in a runoff election. SN leader would beat Toledo with 49.7% to 34%. Similarly, the former mayor of Lima would be imposed by 48.6% to 33% if faced with Keiko. Meanwhile, it would defeat Humala with 51.9% against 36.5% and 48.1% PPK with 31.5% against the leader of the Alliance for the Great Shift.

On the other hand, Toledo will defeat the candidate of 2011 with Force 42.5% to 40% and Humala 45.7% versus 36.5%. However, it would Kuczynski defeated by 38.1% to 40% of the former minister. Meanwhile, Fujimori would beat Ollanta in a runoff by 43.2% against 39.2% and have a technical tie with PPK with 40.2% to 40%.

Finally, the leader of the Alliance for the Great Shift lost if Humala faces by 40.9% compared to 41.7% of nationalism. The truth is that 14 days before the election all is said and left several days of intense campaigning.

Perú21 - Humala is the new leader of the polls , March 27, 2011

ppk NOT
Peru.
... and do not win in 2nd round against who should win.
Again, sorry PPK ... you type that and I wish you the best,
but I vote for Peru.

♣ ♠ F's http://fonchobaggins.blogspot.com @ fonchobaggins Lima, Peru